30.10.09
Anthony Hopkins to Play Odin in Thor! - Superhero Hype!
| Reactions: |
Morale: Commuting To War Backfires
| Reactions: |
Attrition: Rich Kids At War
| Reactions: |
Mexico: Total War Succeeds
| Reactions: |
Afghanistan: Things Don't Look Very Good At All
| Reactions: |
29.10.09
Attrition: Marines Looking Out For Marines
| Reactions: |
Murphy's Law: The F-22 Overwhelms
| Reactions: |
28.10.09
Valour-IT 2009
UPDATE: Valour-IT began Monday. This is a great opportunity to support woulded troops. The project purchases and donates specially equipped laptops to wounded troops that are not able to use a regularly configured computer. As has become traditional, we compete for donations along service lines. Please support Valour-IT. Support Team Army while you're at it.
Army is edging the Marines, but only just. At !2:53 CST, we're ahead by $5!
| Reactions: |
KMBZ - Amendment Would Let Kansas Opt Out of Potential Health Reforms
| Reactions: |
Leadership: Strangers No More
| Reactions: |
Attrition: Winning The Mind Games
| Reactions: |
27.10.09
Information Warfare: China Will Outsmart You
| Reactions: |
26.10.09
Why the vote in Afghanistan is a waste of time - The Globe and Mail
I would say in Iraq, the main reason I did decline was the elections were being held prematurely. In addition, I was not comfortable with the safety and security in the country at the time. In Afghanistan, obviously the safety and security question arises, but much more, I just feel that, to put it bluntly, it's a waste of time at this point by focusing on elections when the country is not ready and not capable of democratic government.
Can you elaborate on that?
My problem is, from what little I know of Afghanistan,"
And right there is where the interview should have ended for lack of all credibility.
| Reactions: |
Conservatives Maintain Edge as Top Ideological Group
| Reactions: |
Dollar Touches 14-Month Low as Recovery Signs Spur Risk Demand - Bloomberg.com
| Reactions: |
My Way News - FACT CHECK: Health insurer profits not so fat
| Reactions: |
U.S. troops hope Afghanistan sacrifices not in vain - Washington Times
'What about the troops who died giving their lives for this mission?' Sgt. Coble asked as she waited for the rocket alert to finish."
| Reactions: |
POLITICO CLICK: President Obama ties George W. Bush on golf - Patrick Gavin
CBS' Mark Knoller — an unofficial documentarian and statistician of all things White House-related — wrote on his Twitter feed that, 'Today - Obama ties Pres. Bush in the number of rounds of golf played in office: 24.
Took Bush 2 yrs & 10 months.'"
| Reactions: |
Air Transportation: Ospreys Over Afghanistan
| Reactions: |
Information Warfare: What Was Going On With The Media
| Reactions: |
25.10.09
Japanese firms to develop small nuclear reactors
| Reactions: |
Winning: Operation War Criminal
| Reactions: |
24.10.09
A Tale of the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate Judiciary Chairman, Both of the United States, and the United States Constitution: Sworn to Protect and Uphold. [JHoward]
"In two acts."
| Reactions: |
Leadership: Nothing Is Safe Anymore
| Reactions: |
Forces: Why The Afghan Army Can't Grow
| Reactions: |
Air Defense: More THAAD
| Reactions: |
Procurement: Yet Still More Stryker
| Reactions: |
23.10.09
Afghanistan: Fighting The Wrong War
| Reactions: |
Army to Field New Plate-Carrier Vest
"We have listened to Soldiers, and we understand that in certain operational environments such as the mountains of Afghanistan, mobility is key to Soldiers' effectiveness against the enemy," said Brig. Gen. Peter Fuller, Program Executive Officer Soldier.
"It's a lot to ask for Soldiers to conduct missions in hilly, rocky terrain at high altitudes, wearing the full complement of body armor," Fuller said. "The plate carrier will give the commanders of those units a more lightweight alternative for their Soldiers."
The full-up plate carrier (including front and side hard armor plates) represents a weight reduction of 10 to 15 pounds compared with the full-up Improved Outer Tactical Vest with front and side hard armor plates.
| Reactions: |
Stimulus II: For Vets, Disabled and Elderly
Vets May Get Another Stimulus Check: "Millions of veterans could get another $250 stimulus check next year if President Barack Obama can convince lawmakers that the move is needed to help the economy.
The plan would follow the economic recovery checks sent out this spring to senior citizens, disabled workers and some veterans as part of the broader stimulus package."
| Reactions: |
22.10.09
Support: It's Only A Useful Illusion
| Reactions: |
Infantry: A Parachute Fit For Big Guys
| Reactions: |
Dems seek cover to boost debt limit - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com
Knowing they will face unyielding GOP attacks for voting to increase the eye-popping debt, Democrats are considering attaching a debt increase provision to a must-pass bill, possibly the Defense Department spending bill, according to Democratic and Republican sources.
Adding it to the defense bill would allow Democrats to argue that they voted for the measure to help troops in harm’s way — and downplay that their vote also expanded the limit for how much money the country can borrow."
| Reactions: |
The Associated Press: Romer: Impact of stimulus will level off
| Reactions: |
21.10.09
Rahm Emmanuel is a Liar
You have literally got into a situation, is there another way you can do this? And the president is asking the questions that have never been asked on the civilian side, the political side, the military side, and the strategic side. What is the impact on the region? What can the Afghan government do or not do? Where are we on the police training? Who would be better doing the police training? Could that be something the Europeans do? Should we take the military side? Those are the questions that have not been asked. And before you commit troops, which is -- not irreversible, but puts you down a certain path -- before you make that decision, there's a set of questions that have to have answers that have never been asked. And it's clear after eight years of war, that's basically starting from the beginning, and those questions never got asked. And what I find interesting and just intriguing from this debate in Washington, is that a lot of people who all of a sudden say, this is now the epicenter of the war on terror, you must do this now, immediately approve what the general said -- where, before, it never even got on the radar screen for them. That -- everything was always about Iraq.I was deployed, twice, to Afghanistan, and specifically for the Afghan National Army training mission. That mission has been going on since the first Special Forces units arrived in country. You can't run a training mission without answering those questions.
An interesting thing to point out is that te answers to to those questions have sometimes changed over time. It's always been a multi-national effort. When I was there in 2003-04, the NCO academy was run by the British, the Officer training by the French, Artillery training by the Mongolians, Tank and automotive training by the Bulgarians, marksmanship by the Romanians....
One of Mr. Emmanuel's specific questions was about police training. In 2003, the police were being trained by the Germans. When I came back in 2006, a decision was made that the US would take that over, and it became a specifically National Guard mission utilizing Guard troops with civilian police experience, much like the Agricultural mission which leverages our National Guard farmers. I wonder if Mr. Emmanuel is even aware of it.
I have a specific answer to one of Mr. Emmanuel's other questions that he posed later in the interview:
Are there different grades of a Taliban?First there's the grammar. "Taliban" is plural, so you can't have "a Taliban." But that aside, yes, there are "grades" of Taliban. Moderate Taliban don't prevent girls from attending school. They wait until after classes are over to kill and rape them.
| Reactions: |
We are 'worried' about weak dollar: Eurogroup chief

| Reactions: |
20.10.09
The Associated Press: Obama to announce help for small banks, businesses
Hmmm. Let me fix that:
President Barack Obama wants greater access to smaller community banks and will use the government's $700 billion financial "rescue" fund to make them beholden to the government or fall prey to a prolonged credit crunch.
How about, instead, we raise interest rates and watch people and businesses save more, which will increase banks' liquidity as well as start reigning in inflationary pressures which are about to explode.
| Reactions: |
UCLA Study: The Internet Is Altering Our Brains - Biology | Astronomy | Chemistry | Physics - FOXNews.com
The results suggest Internet training can stimulate neural activation patterns and could potentially enhance brain function and cognition in older adults."
| Reactions: |
Democrats lock Republicans out of committee room - TheHill.com
| Reactions: |
Higher jobless rates could become the new normal - Salt Lake Tribune
-- The auto and construction industries helped lead the nation out of past recessions. But the carnage among Detroit's automakers and the surplus of new and foreclosed homes and empty commercial properties make it unlikely these two industries will be engines of growth anytime soon.
-- The job market is caught in a vicious circle: Without more jobs, U.S. consumers will have a hard time increasing their spending; but without that spending, businesses might see little reason to start hiring.
-- Many small and midsize businesses are still struggling to obtain bank loans, impeding their expansion plans and constraining overall economic growth.
-- Higher-income households are spending less because of big losses on their homes, retirement plans and other investments. Lower-income households are cutting back because they can't borrow like they once did."
Here's how to fix all of this. The trouble with this plan is that it would hurt, a lot, but only for a short while, and then the growth that will come of it will be deeper and more lasting than any "stimulus."
The missing essential truth is that more spending is not growth. Its just more spending. The stimulus plans are only able to increase spending (sometimes) and not growth.
To increase growth, the first step would be to raise interest rates. Everyone, from businesses to households, need to build up their own liquidity and they do that by saving. Low interest rates, however, discourage saving. And government stimulus desires spending, not saving. In addition it will make the Dollar a more attractive investment and we'll regain ground in the value of the dollar, and foreign investors willing to support our debt.
Additionally, taxes have to be lowered. Tax revenue is NOT dependent on the tax rate. It is dependent on the size of the economy. (Tax revenue is pretty consistenly about 18 - 20% of GNP.) Growing the economy is the only way to grow tax revenue. Lowering taxes will NOT lower revenue. It will allow greater investment, which is what actually spurs growth.
Everyone has to go on an austerity policy for a while, from the government to the smallest households. Quit borrowing. Lay off the credit cards. Make due with what you have and pay off the debts you already have.
They bring a credit card, you bring a pair of scissors. They put one of theirs on account, you put one of yours in the bank. That's how you get out of a recession.
| Reactions: |
The danger of Obama's dithering -- latimes.com
| Reactions: |
19.10.09
Weapons: Jammed Rifles And Other Obsessions
| Reactions: |
U.S. Congressman Sam Johnson : Serving the 3rd District of Texas
| Reactions: |
18.10.09
Leadership: Votes That Kill
The current budget was supposed to have $237 billion for O&M. The cuts amount to less than two percent, and most legislators don't see this as a problem. So what if it takes a little longer for vehicles to get repaired, or that the crews of ships, aircraft and tanks spend less time training as a result? There will be a bit of noise over this, but nothing will change."
...
"Watch how quickly the current flap fades from the news, and public memory. But the troops have to live, or die, with it every day."
| Reactions: |
Murphy's Law: A Smart Bomb With A Heart
| Reactions: |
Iran: The Revolutionary Guard Turns On Its Masters
| Reactions: |
17.10.09
76 days since request for more troops, Obama accused of stalling - Times Online
| Reactions: |
Korea: There Is Great Fear Upon The Land
The Korean War was the first, of only two times since its founding that the UN has attempted to fulfill it's mandate. That it utterly failed, is the origin of the problmes that exist in the region today.
| Reactions: |
Instead of Texas-OU Weekend

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
| Reactions: |
16.10.09
Modern Day Nagumo?
Between 3 and 7 June 1942, the US and Japanese navies clashed over Midway Island, a strategic fueling point for US operations.
The Japanese did not know that the US knew that they planned to strike at Midway, but the US was able to read parts of the IJN codes and so were prepared. Admiral Fletcher, placed 3 US carriers, to Midway's northeast and conducted scouting operations to catch the Japanese assault fleet, expected to come in from the Northwest. It did and Fletcher's plan worked. Scouts found the Japanese carriers and US torpedo planes took off from Midway before the Japanese strike could arrive. Despite that the Midway forces were unable to do direct damage to the opposing ships, the Midway defenses, being forewarned, were ready for the assault. The Japanese air commander recommended another aerial assault. At about this time, Japanese scouts finally spotted, the completely unexpected, US carriers and the Japanese assault commander, Admiral Nagumo, had to make a decision.
Japanese naval doctrine stated that half of a carrier's aircraft should be kept ready for anti-ship operations, that is, armed with torpedoes rather than bombs, intended for land-based targets, and Nagumo had complied. When the recommendation to re-strike the island came in, the order was given to re-arm the planes with bombs for that mission. But now, it was known that US carriers were in the area! Not only had Nagumo missed the opportunity to destroy these ships at Pearl Harbor, but ignoring them would be far too dangerous. So new orders go out to re-arm, yet again, and put the torpedoes back on the planes.
In this dithering, it became impossible to launch, one way or the other, as the returning assault planes had to land. Then came the American carriers' attack. Caught so poorly prepared, refueling, re-arming, Combat Air Patrols pulled out of position by earlier strikes, and no most importantly, no clear or timely decisions being made, the US attack left the Sōryū, Kaga, and Akagi in flames. Only one Japanese carrier Hiryū, remained undamaged. The next US assault will catch this ship with its pilots having supper.
Today, in Afghanistan, we have a commander-in-chief who seems to be trying to reprise Nagumo's dithering. In March we were told there would be a new, more aggressive strategy, and the commander at that time was relieved. In August the new campaign commander, GEN McChrystal made recommendations for that more aggressive strategy, yet now the reassessment, it seems, must be reassessed. Had Nagumo made one decision and then applied his will to make it stick, he might have overcome the superior US intelligence, the only clear advantage of US forces at the start of the battle. Successful land assault could have enabled the Japanese to use the island for further operations against the US fleet, or promptly abandoning the assault to take on the US carriers, might have allowed the stronger Japanese force to resume against Midway at leisure. Half of November is now gone and the President still has not made a decision.
| Reactions: |
Afghanistan: Pay To Play
| Reactions: |
Electronic Weapons: Naked In The Jungle
| Reactions: |
13.10.09
Dollar loses reserve status to yen & euro
Economists warn that a jump in rates will clobber stocks and cripple the already stalled housing market.
'Bernanke's other choice is to keep rates at zero, print even more money and sell more debt, but we'll see triple-digit inflation that could collapse the economy as we know it.
'The stimulus is what's toxic -- we're poisoning ourselves and the global economy with it.'"
With friends like this, who needs enemies?
| Reactions: |
"Does the U.S. Army need to step up its game when it comes to technology or are we keeping up with our sister services?"
We embrace a lot of technology that has a high gee-whiz factor--it looks splashy and sexy and everyone can see that it's expensive when it's placed front and center.
We fail, majorly fail, to leverage the technology we already have that can do so much more to really help us to accomplish our missions. If you aren't sure about that, do a little study as to what capabilities are built into Microsoft Office, or even just Outlook, and then decide if we even scratch the surface in using tools that are loaded on almost every PC and server across the Army enterprise.
What we forget is that technology is both a tool and a trap. We need to maximize the tools we already have, before digging deeper into the trap presented by all those gee-whiz, high profile things.
I explain the technology trap like this: Technology is a big box that all its users live underneath, while the box is propped up by a stick. While the stick is in place, we are free to enter and exit the box. Almost no one is aware of the string that's tied to that stick, however, and it dosen't matter if the string is yanked on, or somoene just trips over it, when the stick is pulled free, everyone under the box is stuck inside. As an IT pro, my job is to keep shoving sandbags under the edges of the box, in hopes that I'll still be able to lead others back out, after the trap is sprung. I also have to arrange comfortable seating inside as well.
For what I hope is a clear example of this, has everyone looked at the new SICPS suite? Transit cased servers and routers and switches. VOIP phones and GPS. Fire control computers and encryption transfer devices. What do we do when the batteries die? Are we preserving the capability to do our jobs with stubby pencils, acetate overlays, and compasses?
Will we still have that capacity in a generation or two (and military generations are about half that of social generations)? The SICPS thing scares me to death. It's a big sexy, gee-whiz failure looking for really bad place to happen. It's also poorly architected--all the bells and whistles--no safty features. No backup. No redundancy. No high-availability solutions. None of the sand bags I try to provide all my civilian customers.
This is a long way around of saying that I don't know if the otehr services do it better. If better just means more, then the answer is probably--it sure seems that way. But if better means smarter--I have no direct comparison, but from what I know of what we are doing now, then it's almost certain.
| Reactions: |
Attrition: Huey Retires After 50 Years

| Reactions: |
Morale: Armed And Anxious Alcoholics Anonymous
| Reactions: |
First M-ATVs Deploy to Afghanistan


I don't know that I'd want it. Look at that tiny rear door and window. That seems to me to be egress issue and zero visibility, not only for passengers, but also for the driver and TC to anything behind the vehicle.
| Reactions: |
12.10.09
Information Warfare: Hit The G Spot and Stream Video

| Reactions: |
Surface Forces : USVs No Longer Improvised

| Reactions: |
11.10.09
Information Warfare: Share And Share Alike
| Reactions: |
Murphy's Law: Fried Foods Win The Air War
| Reactions: |
9.10.09
Intelligence: China Tech Theft Effort Under Attack
| Reactions: |
Armor: Bradley 2.0
| Reactions: |
Afghanistan: Cultural Insensitivity
| Reactions: |
8.10.09
First rate analysis
Watch CBS News Videos Online
...At least of facts on the ground. I differ with teh idea that individual Soldier's can be reassured that the President "isn't taking this lightly." That's just not true, to begin with. Everything from the Olympics to breaking in his new basketball court is more important apparently, and ditthering about making a decision is not reassuring in any way.
Appologies for the Ralph Nader bit at the end. It's about New Orleans, so you can skip it without any fear of missing any correct information.
| Reactions: |
7.10.09
Leadership: The Impossible Dream In Afghanistan
| Reactions: |
Armor: Goodbye To The Heavies
| Reactions: |